Sentence examples for process and substantive from inspiring English sources

This paper presents a framework for understanding and managing both process and substantive trade-offs within each step of a typical sustainability assessment process.

Overall, we argue that there is inadequate consideration of trade-offs, both process and substantive, throughout the sustainability assessment process, and insufficient considerations of how process decisions and compromises influence substantive outcomes.

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies against only the states, but it is otherwise textually identical to the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which applies against the federal government; both clauses have been interpreted to encompass identical doctrines of procedural due process and substantive due process.

This internal co-ordination is not without challenges, as each entity has different organizational cultures, administrative processes, and substantive expertise.

The Peace Accords Matrix (PAM) project defines a CPA as the final agreement negotiated to end intrastate armed conflict that involves (a) major conflict actors in the negotiation process, and (b) substantive issues included in the negotiation [ 28, 29].

As such, there are both substantive and procedural considerations associated with the due process clause, and this has influenced the development of two separate tracks of due process jurisprudence: procedural and substantive.

In the United States, due process has both procedural and substantive components.

In doing this, the role of the researcher is less central, and becomes more one of facilitation and process than substantive analytic contribution – such as in the dialogical methods identified in our review.

Procedural due process is the guarantee of a fair legal process when the government seeks to burden a person's protected interests in life, liberty, or property, and substantive due process is the guarantee that the fundamental rights of citizens will not be encroached on by government.

Its two pillars were the sanctity of contract and "substantive due process".

On behalf of 11 teachers, 2 students and parents, Martinez's motion charges that the "vagueness and overbreadth" of the Ethnic Studies ban and "its enforcement by Superintendents (John Huppenthal and Tom Hornerne violate the plaintiffs' constitutional rights," and adds that "statute and its application violate the plaintiffs' rights to Equal Protection, Free Speech and Substantive Due Process".