Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
Abstracts in conference proceedings were excluded.
Conference proceedings were excluded.
Abstracts or meeting proceedings were excluded because of the limited data.
In terms of exclusion criteria, all qualitative studies, commentaries, editorials, literature reviews, and conference proceedings were excluded from this review.
Studies published as abstracts only (e.g., conference proceedings) were excluded, since their quality could not be adequately assessed.
Studies of only highly selected groups (e.g. undergoing cardiac surgery or case reports), and conference proceedings were excluded.
Similar(49)
Second, we have reviewed academic/professional journals articles only; conference proceedings and dissertation were excluded, as we assumed that high quality research eventually published in academic/professional journals.
Results were limited to studies in English, while conference proceedings and commentaries were excluded.
Furthermore, to increase the accuracy of results, research was refined and limited to original research articles and review articles because they represent the research activities, while other types of documents, such as editorials, conference proceedings, and others, were excluded.
For example, grey literature searching was limited in its scope, conference proceedings and trial registers were excluded, and a limited number of relevant websites were selected for searching.
In addition, we also identified five studies from the conference proceedings search; three of them were excluded because they were duplicates.
More suggestions(15)
discussions were excluded
transcripts were excluded
proceedings were concluded
process were excluded
trial were excluded
discussion were excluded
proceedings were finished
proceedings were carried
proceedings were given
proceedings were directed
proceedings were broadcast
proceedings were opened
proceedings were marked
proceedings were put
proceedings were suspended
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com