Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
To ensure that this increased sensitivity to infections did not result from our experimental procedures, we compared the survival of LXB-injected flies to phosphate-buffered-saline (PBS) injected flies after a M. luteus challenge and found that only the former succumbed (data not shown; see also below).
In addition to the analyses described for breast procedures, we compared SSI rates among institutions with >150 procedures.
12 To investigate the stability of the assay procedures, we compared the previously obtained values with values obtained for the present investigation.
In order to confirm that qPCR was an appropriate choice for validating RNA amplification procedures, we compared the brain vs. liver expression ratios on oligonucleotide arrays of SenseAmp version 1 2 amplified to unamplified RNA (not shown).
To get a better understanding of whether CDKN1C?s expression is directly affected by the expression of KCNQ1OT1 from the maternal allele or if it is an artifact of the ART procedures we compared the CDKN1C expression of ART-J835LOS and ART-J489ALOS to the five remaining LOS conceptuses.
Similar(55)
In a hierarchical closed-testing procedure, we compared combined behavioural programme arms with brief intervention, then compared the 12-week programme and 52-week programme.
Using a MANCOVA procedure, we compared homozygous carriers of the S/S allele (N=179) to carriers of the VL/VL allele (N=152), controlling for demographic and cardiovascular covariates.
Following this procedure, we compared the simulated and experimental data for the two behavioral states.
To define the potential benefit of our fractionation procedure, we compared ID numbers of MudPIT runs of the unfractionated soluble sample to the fractionated soluble sample (three fractions).
In order to assess the efficacy of this procedure, we compared individual Taqman qPCR assay results from wells using single subject RNA to wells using pooled RNA of those same individual subjects.
To evaluate the performance of our recovery procedure, we compared our results with predictions based on the Rfam T-box HMM.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com