Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The predictive ability of the model was estimated by cross-validation and by external predictions for new HIV variants; both procedures showed very high correlation between the predicted and actual susceptibility values (Q2 = 0.89 and Q2ext = 0.86).
Where an adequate quantity of data was reported and calculations were possible, compliance with procedures showed very little or no difference before and after the intervention (Table 4).
Similar(58)
Both diagnostic procedures showed a very good agreement in detecting AAB (kappa = 0.828) and differentiating respective immunofluorescence patterns.
The HS model showed very poor calibration, whereas the LR model was well calibrated even without any recalibration procedure.
Our results showed very similar values for inter-rater reliability, validity and internal consistency compared to the original CAHAI which support the suggested TCCA procedure.
The procedure seems to show very good numerical stability and convergence properties.
Comparisons between experimental data and predicted results derived from the analytical procedure showed a very good agreement.
Dedifferentiation procedures have so far shown very low efficiency.
Data on adipose tissue area were acquired through use of the CT cross-sectional scan, a validated procedure that has been demonstrated to show very low interobserver variation [ 32, 33].
The proposed procedure is tested on a low-rise and a high-rise building showing very good performances.
This procedure showed that certain combinations did not exist or were very rare.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com