Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In our application both procedures gave identical results (eleven areas thresholded at level 20%).
Similar(59)
As detailed in 'Materials and methods', two different thresholding procedures gave virtually identical results in this approach.
For comparison the SJA values for comparing the corresponding NJ and ML trees for MT, AlkB, HEL and RdRp were 0.054, 0.000, 0.040 and 0.003, respectively, showing that the NJ and ML procedures gave almost identical tree structures.
Finally, we found that adding an affinity step to the above procedure to purify the mCD4 via its His6 tag gave identical results as without this extra step.
Both measures gave identical results.
Both methods gave identical results.
Both gave identical results.
The AFADE 16 samples gave identical results.
Both primer combinations gave identical results.
Different framing of questions gave identical responses.
This gave identical results to those presented.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com