Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
The results from the proposed calibration procedure were compared to those obtained using a conventional static calibration technique.
Glucose contents obtained by the proposed procedure were compared with those obtained by using the phenol-4-AAP method, the error was found to be less than 3%.
The psychometric method of constants, a 1-up-1-down Levitt procedure and a 2-up-1-down Levitt procedure were compared experimentally to find the most accurate and efficient paired comparison scheme.
The seismic demands resulting from the NADP procedure were compared to those from the nonlinear response history analysis (NL-RHA) as a benchmark solution, as well as to those predicted by the modal pushover analysis (MPA) and displacement-based adaptive pushover (DAP) procedures.
Visits to the otolaryngologist, number of computed tomography (CT) scans, number of antibiotic and steroid prescriptions, and duration of time from first visit to procedure were compared.
Twenty one patients with primary RRD who developed postoperative PVR within 2½ months after the surgical procedure were compared with 54 patients with primary RRD who had an uncomplicated follow-up.
Similar(43)
The proposed procedure is compared with some possible competitors.
The new estimation scheme and the standard procedure are compared.
This procedure was compared with traditional perceptual identification (Experiment 2).
The procedure is compared with an alternative prepared for New South Wales.
The effectiveness of TiO2 mediated photocatalytic pretreatment procedure was compared to commonly used alumina polishing procedure.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com