Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
Following this procedure, we compared the simulated and experimental data for the two behavioral states.
To define the potential benefit of our fractionation procedure, we compared ID numbers of MudPIT runs of the unfractionated soluble sample to the fractionated soluble sample (three fractions).
In order to assess the efficacy of this procedure, we compared individual Taqman qPCR assay results from wells using single subject RNA to wells using pooled RNA of those same individual subjects.
To evaluate the performance of our recovery procedure, we compared our results with predictions based on the Rfam T-box HMM.
To check for the consistency of this procedure we compared the results obtained using the linear Blinder - Oaxaca decomposition and the non-linear one (ordered probit specification).
As a check on the randomization procedure, we compared the two treatment groups (amalgam or composite) in terms of the distributions of sex, race, and baseline values of age, urinary mercury concentration, urinary creatinine concentration, blood lead concentration, and IQ.
Similar(43)
To check the validity of the procedure, we compare the obtained slip parameters with those from other chemical approaches.
To validate that the proposed analytical model is consistent with real random access procedure, we compare the analytical results obtained using the SMM model with the simulation results produced based on the protocol implementation.
In our network inference procedure, we compare two tree-based ensemble methods based on randomization, namely Random Forests [31] and Extra-Trees [32].
To ensure that this increased sensitivity to infections did not result from our experimental procedures, we compared the survival of LXB-injected flies to phosphate-buffered-saline (PBS) injected flies after a M. luteus challenge and found that only the former succumbed (data not shown; see also below).
In addition to the analyses described for breast procedures, we compared SSI rates among institutions with >150 procedures.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com