Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
To check the validity of the procedure, we compare the obtained slip parameters with those from other chemical approaches.
To validate that the proposed analytical model is consistent with real random access procedure, we compare the analytical results obtained using the SMM model with the simulation results produced based on the protocol implementation.
In our network inference procedure, we compare two tree-based ensemble methods based on randomization, namely Random Forests [31] and Extra-Trees [32].
Similar(57)
Following this procedure, we compared the simulated and experimental data for the two behavioral states.
To define the potential benefit of our fractionation procedure, we compared ID numbers of MudPIT runs of the unfractionated soluble sample to the fractionated soluble sample (three fractions).
In order to assess the efficacy of this procedure, we compared individual Taqman qPCR assay results from wells using single subject RNA to wells using pooled RNA of those same individual subjects.
To evaluate the performance of our recovery procedure, we compared our results with predictions based on the Rfam T-box HMM.
To check for the consistency of this procedure we compared the results obtained using the linear Blinder - Oaxaca decomposition and the non-linear one (ordered probit specification).
As a check on the randomization procedure, we compared the two treatment groups (amalgam or composite) in terms of the distributions of sex, race, and baseline values of age, urinary mercury concentration, urinary creatinine concentration, blood lead concentration, and IQ.
To confirm the validity of our procedure, we compared mosaic segregants with their pure parental strains, because it is well known that genetic mosaicism results in phenotypic variance [ 11].
To assess the robustness of our dual-choice test procedure, we compared the menthol-preference indices (MPIs) in flies exposed, or not, to menthol during their complete development (F0; nos. 2 and 1 in Fig. 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com