Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The present numerical procedure shows better predictions than Karoutas et al.
Similar(59)
Future research should use objective and systematic data to examine whether patients who received the preoperative orthopedic procedure show better clinical outcomes after primary cleft repair.
In such situations, the 3-D spline surface flattening procedure would show better results than 2-D rigid registrations methods, as the 2-D registration approaches only aim to correct the motion artifacts, but do not address the tilt artifacts.
Research shows: Better nights = Better days!
Thus, we conclude that the errors introduced by assuming a skew-normal distribution of MPD values appear to be comparable to or smaller than those introduced by standard resampling procedures, while also showing better scaling with increased tip sample size.
In the present study, we traced endocardial borders manually and excluded RV trabeculation from calculation of RV-MMI, which is a standard procedure in ventricular volumetry and has shown better reproducibility in systemic RVs [ 29].
All analyzed samples showed better perforation efficiencies than the standard procedure (see Fig. 5(a) and 6 ).
Our study clearly showed better yields and fewer complications when the biopsy procedure and radiological imaging were both performed by nephrologists per se.
Our results do not support published literature showing better outcome in patients with fewer previous surgical procedures prior to cartilage repair.
The existing literature shows that large enterprises show better performance because their diversification, scale economy, and formal procedures make operations and management more effective (Penrose 1995).
If there is no difference in terms of procedure-related complications, it is reasonable that percutaneous renal biopsies should be operated by the practitioner showing better tissue adequacy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com