Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Of the 16 831 Aboriginal children in the cohort, 310 received their first VTI procedure during 72 663 person-years of follow-up, giving a procedure rate of 4.3 (95% CI 3.8 to 4.8 /1000 person-years (table 1).
Of the 636 719 non-Aboriginal children, 16 781received their first VTI procedure during 2 916 105 person-years of follow-up, which equals a procedure rate of 5.8 (95% CI 5.7 to 5.8 /1000 person-years (table 1).
Similar(58)
In 4591 patients in the RE-LY trial who underwent an invasive procedure, rates of major bleeding from a week before the procedure to 30 days after were similar across treatment groups (3.8% for dabigatran 110 mg, 5.1% for dabigatran 150 mg, and 4.6% for warfarin; P>0.05 for each two way comparison).
In fact, the χ2 statistic appears to have higher values as a procedure rate increased, regardless of the actual underlying variability.
Moreover this procedure rates reporting of the items.
Especially in patients with persistent AF the majority of operators reached a single procedure success rate of over 50%, which is remarkable given the procedure times of >3 h in most centres and cases.
In the RD optimization procedure, the rate of the redundant motion vector should be taken into account.
However, a meta-analysis by Calkins et al. [ 13] revealed a single procedure success rate of 72% (on or off antiarrhythmic medication).
In persistent AF, success rates were significantly lower with 70% [median 74% (IQR 60 92%)]; P = 0.05) as well as the first procedure success rate of 58% [median 55% (IQR 47 81%)]; P = 0.001).
As in any other invasive procedure, the rate of complications depends not only on the inherent problems of the technique but also on the experience of the operating physician [ 14, 17], as well as on a proper patient selection.
Overall success was significantly lower with 70% (median 74% [IQR 60 92%]; P = 0.05) as well as the first procedure success rate of 58% (median 55% [IQR 47 81%]; P = 0.001, Table 3 ).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com