Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
A previous study using an identical experimental procedure found a dissociation between video-recorded movement and rate of lever-pressing, suggesting that these measures tap into different behaviors [ 70].
A recent re-analysis of these data classifying studies into those that tried to maximize placebo effects and into trials that used placebo only as a control procedure found a large effect size of d =.95 for studies maximizing placebo effects, which was significantly different from studies using placebo as control (d =.15) [ 12].
Similar(58)
Sadler et al. [ 14] already demonstrated that for excisions of 17 mm or more the risk of pPROM but not of PD was higher (RR 3.6, 95% CI 1.8 7.5), whereas Samson et al. and Sjøborg et al., independently from depth of excision, after cervical laser conisation or loop electrosurgical excision procedure found an increased risk of both pPROM and PD [ 15, 16].
Hence, the procedure finds a slice around the previous value for which the posterior value is higher.
In fact, it is easy to explain: arguing as in [[6], Theorem 2.1.3], take u 0 ∈ S r 0 F ( x ¯ ), u 0 ∉ x ¯, as an initial point and, using the iteration procedure, find a fixed point u ¯ of the map S r 0 F. Since q < 1 / 2, it is easy to show that u ¯ ≠ x ¯.
This procedure finds a set of h < k vertices that disconnects the input graph, producing several connected components of the graph.
If you wish to undergo this procedure, find a doctor who has done it before.
Indeed, a study of 16,204 people examined with a variety of medical procedures found a significantly greater number of adverse reactions due to blood drawing than allergy skin testing.
The procedure finds an optimally weighted sum of predictor variables for predicting the dependent variable.
An observational study of over 17 000 procedures found "an etiological relationship between the administration of LMWH and the ensuing risk related to surgical site infections".
If there is still a problem after following the above procedures, find a software that will help fix the problem.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com