(A) A schematic of the experimental procedure; (B) A list of mTOR-mediated phosphopeptides from ribosomal proteins; (C) Kinases and motifs analysis of mTOR-mediated phosphorylated peptides; (D) Locations of the mTOR-mediated phosphoresidues on human 80S ribosome.
The fundamental frequencies of vibration of a clamped rectangular plate with thickness varying in a bilinear fashion in the x-direction are determined, for various values of the plate parameters, by two different approaches: (a) the Rayleigh-Schmidt minimization procedure; (b) a finite element algorithm.
For example, which procedure would be diagnostically superior if Procedure A yielded a HR of.80 and a FAR of.05, whereas Procedure B yielded a HR of.60 and a FAR of.02?
For example, if Procedure A yielded a HR of.80 and a FAR of.05, whereas Procedure B yielded a HR of.60 and a FAR of.20, it would be difficult to defend the argument that the police should use Procedure B based on some consideration having to do with the rate of filler IDs vs. no IDs for the two procedures.
Imagine that when conservative responding was encouraged for Procedure A, the HR dropped from.80 to.65 (still higher than Procedure B, with a HR of.60) and the FAR dropped from.05 to.02 (now equal to Procedure B).
For example, in the OIC procedure originally described by Dix and Aggleton [5], animals received two exposures to each of the objects, A and B, in their respective contexts in a double alternation procedure (A, B, B, A); however in most OIC reports animals received only one preexposure to each of A and B [4,6 8,11,12,31].
Instead of switching from Procedure A to Procedure B to achieve a FAR as low as.02, it would make more sense to stick with Procedure A and to induce more conservative responding.
We next insert the remaining excluded sequences by using the procedure (b), and get a local S-core set in which MP gives a unique tree within this subgroup.
Procedure B: 1. Perform a number of pairs of simulation runs, where a. each pair comprises the two alternative systems/algorithms and b. the number of runs is designed to take an acceptable amount of time.
As to Cryolock, significant differences were observed between both procedures, being procedure B, more efficient with a yield of 38% in MII stage and increased to 49% due to the co-culture with fresh granulosa cells.
(a) signature procedure; (b) authentication procedure.
