Sentence examples for procedural validity from inspiring English sources

"Procedural validity" is the appropriateness of the procedures used in standard setting, with poor procedure casting doubt on the validity of a pass mark but good procedure alone being unable to validate a pass mark.

Procedural validity speaks only of the evaluation procedure and not to the validity of the construct itself, and is defined as the extent to which a new diagnostic procedure yields results similar to the results of an established diagnostic procedure that is used as a criterion [ 28].

We evaluated the procedural validity of the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, DSM-5 Version (AUDADIS-5) assessment of these disorders through clinician re-interviews.

The purpose of this study was to assess the procedural validity of the substance disorder modules of the lay-administered Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Version (AUDADIS-5) through clinician re-appraisal re-interviews.

Little is known about the procedural validity of lay-administered, fully-structured assessments of depressive, anxiety and post-traumatic stress (PTSD) disorders in the general population as determined by comparison with clinical re-appraisal, and whether this differs between current regular substance abusers and others.

Moreover, the agreement of experienced and inexperienced raters supports the "procedural validity" of INTERMED.

Baseline, procedural, outcome and validity data were systematically appraised and pooled, when appropriate, with random-effect methods.

We extracted a comprehensive set of key study, patient, procedural, outcome, and validity features from the included studies.

There are no studies comparing the validity of procedural coding in the NHDR between elective and acute surgical procedures.

Regarding construct validity, neither procedural nor content-based structures are clearly identifiable, perhaps due to the strong correction bias in the data (Winther, 2011).

Particularly, the study assessed the family adherence to the PTR intervention, changes in child behavior, family use of the Individualized Behavior Rating Scale Tool (IBRST), procedural integrity, and social validity.