Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Overall, the participants placed a strong emphasis on research questions related to assessing the prevalence and burden associated with mental health and psychosocial problems (e.g., prevalence of mental disorders, common psychosocial problems, and the wider impact of mental health problems on productivity, livelihoods, family and community functioning).
Similar(59)
For example, problems of productivity, compositionality, and systematicity for associationist theorizing appear to be variants of the problem of predication (for more on these specific issues see the entries on the Language of Thought Hypothesis and on compositionality).
[B1.] One Less Problem in Productivity New research from economists suggests that one potential problem with statistics on productivity -- the measurement of hours worked -- is less of a problem than previously thought.
The Activity Impairment Assessment (AIA) was developed for the purposes of the present study by the authors in 2003 and was based on an existing work productivity measure (the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6) [ 12] to evaluate the impact of health problems on individual performance and productivity.
The SPS evaluates the impact of health problems on individual performance and productivity by rating six statements on a five-point scale [ 34, 41].
And with excess weight comes an excess of problems which have a snowball effect on productivity and the health of the nation.
Part two consist of the Short Form-Health and Labour Questionnaire (SF-HLQ) an instrument that collects data on productivity losses due to health problems.
Second, the magnitude of productivity effects was adapted from the study of Pauly et al 19 who concludes an average impact of presenteeism on productivity of 0.27 for chronic health problems.
Excess demand was not mentioned as a major problem, given that more demand generates greater income based on productivity.
Van Ark et al on productivity.
Dew-Becker and Gordon on productivity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com