Mexican criminal justice expert Layda Negrete said that by presenting such problematic evidence as truth, the authorities are reinforcing the lack of transparency and right to a fair trial in Mexico's deeply flawed justice system.
Think of the Internet: an unimaginably powerful tool for education but also a Wild West of random self-expression in which anyone can say anything about anything (or anyone) and have it "published," and which has already made problematic the line between truth and falsehood, expert and amateur opinion, authentic and inauthentic identities, reality and fantasy.
But more generally, it remains to be seen whether an appropriate notion of a judgement's referential net, its projection, can be made out that's isn't too permissive thereby including illegitimate truth-makers without having truth-makers withoutthavinge notoobviously clearer or more problematic than that of truth-making itself (see Smith 2002 andeployiederesourcesor conthatting prognoses).
This proposal is problematic given that it produces truth conditions for conditionals in terms of the truth conditions of other conditionals.
In the age of weibo, it may be that the wisps of truth prove more problematic for authorities than the clouds of falsehood.
However, contemporary pluralists reject this problematic idea, maintaining instead that truth is "multiply realizable".
In view of such considerations, objectivists might argue, it is not necessary to have recourse to the otherwise problematic notion of relative moral truth.
Thus, instead of the problematic inference above, from the truth of [~E!a] at w, by □FEG, it follows by only that [E!a → ∃x~E!x] is true at w. So, where a is Adams, from the truth of [Adams does not exist] at w it only follows — trivially, due to its false antecedent — that [If Adams exists, then something does not exist] is true at w.
But these days, when so much of contemporary art aims to subvert rather than investigate the truth, it can be problematic to bring art into a science museum.
In general, we rely on evidence in cases in which our access to truth would otherwise be problematic.
