Tasks varied in the degree to which they were problematic, the degree to which students were in positions of authority or had ownership over the tasks, and the amount and type of resources to which students had access.
We believe that much of this variation can be explained by the extent to which three additional heuristics were manifested at the task level: the extent to which tasks were problematic, the degree of ownership/authority, and access to resources.
In reality, our relationships with capitalism are all complicated and problematic to varying degrees.
The GPs raised several problem areas in the encounter with the psychiatric patient which, although mentioned by all, were problematic to differing degrees in differently organised casualty clinics.
Comparing the summary RRs for the different definitions shown above is to some degree problematic because of differences in study populations and analytic approaches.
Both forms of coarsening from daily to annual, and from annual to quinquennial are only problematic when the degree of coarseness is large relative to the average disparity or category sizes being measured.
This explanation, however, is problematic because the degree of mtDNA divergence found between the Mamshit and the western Negev populations is not likely to have arisen over such a short period of time.
And finally, while it may perhaps seem right to say that there is something unintelligible or meaningless about questioning the principle of non-contradiction (although this can also be challenged: cf. Priest 1987), other skeptical doubts do not seem problematic to the same degree.
However, this approach of using kinetic information obtained in vitro, or maybe even from different organisms, is naturally problematic due to some degree of bias and uncertainty.
For instance, 81% of the Swedish sample and 68% of the Norwegian sample found it problematic to assess the degree to which the reduced functional capacity limited a patient's capacity to work (p < 0.05).
