In this context, Alan Love (2005, 2008) uses the notion of a problem agenda to argue that some scientific problems not only motivate interdisciplinary research but also provide structure for the requisite intellectual coordination (see also Brigandt 2010, 2012, Brigandt and Love 2010).
There is a road which you can define in which I am in the middle, but part of my problem is to argue that people should be on a different road.
Indeed, their response to the latter is pathetic: my colleagues tend to feel sorry for themselves, to blame the news media, to assert that it is the bishops' problem, and to argue that it is not the most serious crisis facing the church.
But by far the most widely-favoured solution to the 'tautology problem' was to argue that this supervenient property is a propensity a probability distribution over possible numbers of offspring (Mills and Beatty 1979).
Plato's own solution to this problem was to argue that the property distinctively possessed by knowledge is that of being 'tied-down' to the truth, like the mythical tethered statues of Daedalus which were so life-like that they were tied to the ground to ensure that they did not run away.
One line of response to this problem is to argue that it doesn't follow from the low truth-ratio of processes in the demon world that the beliefs must be categorized as unjustified according to reliabilism, because reliabilism need not use the processes' truth-ratios in the world of the example as the standard of evaluation.
One way to respond to this potential problem is to argue that there is no violation of the principle requiring toleration for a person's conscience when government fails to exempt a person who wishes to act on her conscience in a way that violates an otherwise valid law.
Getting rid of tipping or just not tipping your server is in no way going to correct these problems and to argue they are related is to not see the forest for the trees.
The biggest mystery about tobacco taxation is why more European governments have not followed Britain's example, and steadily raised tobacco taxes at above the inflation rate.Tobacco companies have used the problem of smuggling to argue for a reversal of this policy in Britain, but nothing suggests this will happen.
This simplified version of the problem allowed Turing to argue convincingly that a "thinking machine" was at least plausible and the paper answered all the most common objections to the proposition.
