Exact(6)
These questions are typically designed to elicit minimal, 'no problem' responses, but patients sometimes produce expanded responses that extend beyond the projected information.
We illustrate these problems through examples in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 Reader-Tag Collision Problem: responses of a tag to a reader when queried are drowned out by the interfering signal from another concurrently operating reader in the vicinity.
With regards to the ceiling, the 5L showed a slightly decreasing trend for no problem responses compared with the 3L.
Bivariate analyses were completed first to enable associations between 'Any problems' (combining 'Some' and 'Extreme' problem responses) with the six outcomes of interest (the five dimensions of the EQ-5D, and cognitive ability) and the independent measures to be assessed.
Overuse was assessed with 4 questions: 1) general overuse ("Too many patients getting medical tests and treatments that they don't really need… is a major problem, minor problem, or not a problem"; responses to the latter two categories combined, don't know responses deleted (3 %)).
Underuse was assessed with 3 questions: 1) general underuse of care ("Too many patients NOT getting the medical tests and treatments that they need is a major problem, minor problem, or not a problem", responses to the latter two categories combined, don't know responses deleted (2 %)).
Similar(54)
Discussion of those proposals is found in the supplementary document Embedding Problem Response Strategies.
These are discussed in more detail in the supplementary document Embedding Problem Response Strategies.
A more thorough discussion of these issues can be found in the supplementary document Embedding Problem Response Strategies.
(But see the discussion of hybrid theories below and in the supplementary document Embedding Problem Response Strategies).
For a more thorough survey see the supplementary document Embedding Problem Response Strategies, which can be read in place of the remainder of section 4.1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com