Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
The aim of the original position, Rawls announced (1999, 16), is to settle "the question of justification … by working out a problem of deliberation".
Rawls realizes, however, that gaining traction on the problem of justification is difficult, and responds by converting it into a social choice problem: "the question of justification [can be] settled by working out a problem of deliberation" (Rawls 1971, 16).
Again, though, the power to obligate oneself is not typically invoked in the contemporary social contract: the problem of deliberation is supposed to help us make headway on the problem of justification.
Similar(57)
A main problem here is what kind of deliberation, justification, or reasoning is supposed to be at work.
This is not to say that fatalism does not pose any problem at all for the rationality of deliberation.
As I discuss in more detail below, it is natural to conceive of deliberation as an attempt to solve some practical problem.
The aim of deliberation is to find a satisfactory means to resumption of activity by solving the problem posed by one's situation.
After three hours of deliberation, they refer.
But it still does a great deal of deliberation.
After months of deliberation, Wiens opted for the procedure.
The jury delivered its verdict after 15 hours of deliberation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com