Exact(5)
"Every time a problem blows up, the government reaches for the same old tricks.
Mr. Jane's character, like Mr. Washington's, a former black-ops specialist for the United States government who struggles with a drinking problem, blows up half of Tampa, Fla., in his crusade against the baddies who wiped out his family.
We know from Theorem 5.1 of [8] and Theorem 3.3 of [29] that if λ > 1 the solution of this first initial boundary value problem blows up in finite time for any nonnegative nontrivial initial data.
Therefore, the solution of equation (3.3) is an upper solution of the following problem: v ′ ( t ) = ( T − k ) v α + β − k, v ( 0 ) = v 0. Since T > k and α + β > 1, the solution of this problem blows up in finite time if v 0 > ( k T − k ) 1 α + β.
Since m + n > r, we know that v m + n + 1 > v r and | Ω | v m + n − α v r ≥ v m + n − α, and hence, the solution of (3.1) is an upper solution of the following problem: v ′ ( t ) = v m + n − α, v ( 0 ) = v 0. When | Ω | > α and m + n > 1, it is known that the solution of this problem blows up in finite time if v 0 > 1 m + n.
Similar(55)
They will have no effect on someone who has no problem blowing himself up," he says.
With a short-notice business-class flight to Johannesburg starting at £3,000, and four chukkas costing up to £250 a day (excluding bed and board) you'll have no problem blowing £5,000 before you get back to your desk on a Monday morning.
Or just a small problem blown out of proportion by tort lawyers?
The Path problem blew over, as these things tend to do, but government's involvement in the matter did not.
There have been many methods to choose from when determining whether the solutions to the given evolution problem blow up in finite time or not, for instance, the (first) eigenvalue method, the concavity argument, the comparison method based on maximum principle and other methods based on delicate integration.
Keep in mind, all this is happening while its CEO says he has no problem blowing a $1 billion on an internet photo outfit without consulting his board.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com