probing for consistency

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "probing for consistency" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where one is seeking to verify or ensure that information or data aligns or is coherent. Example: "During the meeting, we spent a significant amount of time probing for consistency in the project's objectives and the team's understanding."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The research assistants administering the questionnaires have specialized training and experience in asking sensitive questions, probing for consistency and clarity, transitioning from one section to another and keeping interviewees engaged; they also have strong HIV and ART counseling skills.

BMC Public Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Symptoms related to shigellosis were probed for consistency under the cholera vignette but were less often mentioned spontaneously or identified as most troubling and hence yielded a lower prominence than symptoms of general gastroenteritis or dehydration.

BMC Infectious Diseases

The probe set was validated for consistency by analysis of 10 healthy controls, with a standard deviation <0.1 for each probe.

Human Reproduction

The probe set was validated for consistency.

Human Reproduction

As the majority of the Gene Array probes were generally selected for consistency with the Exon Array as well as uniquely matching to the human genome, we would expect that the Gene Array to be optimized for effective probe hybridizations.

BMC Genomics

Since we have only two probes per a probe set (with one exception), we can only check for consistency of the probe pair behavior.

Biology Direct

In our analyses, we chose a single representative probe set for each human gene, and for consistency, we used the same probe sets selected based upon the criteria stated above.

BMC Genomics

For consistency, the probe sequences and their genomic strand information were compared between these two annotation sources.

BMC Genomics

64 The point will be marked for consistency of US probe location.

BMJ Open

Ensembl genes were used for consistency with the original probe annotation files.

BMC Genomics

For consistency, we also used RMA method to obtain probe set expression summaries from the original *CEL files of this study.

BMC Genomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When "probing for consistency", use specific questions to uncover discrepancies, rather than relying on broad inquiries.

Common error

Avoid assuming consistency exists; always verify with detailed examination. "Probing for consistency" is essential because assumptions can lead to inaccurate conclusions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "probing for consistency" functions as a gerund phrase acting as a noun, often describing an action or process of investigation. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase indicates a detailed examination aimed at ensuring agreement and uniformity.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

35%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "probing for consistency" signifies a detailed investigation to ensure uniformity and accuracy. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and used across various domains, notably in science, news, and general writing. While there are alternative phrases like "checking for coherence" or "verifying alignment", the core meaning emphasizes the verification of data to eliminate contradictions. It is crucial to avoid assumptions and to use specific questions to expose any discrepancies. The usage of this phrase is mostly appropriate for neutral to formal settings where precision is required.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

checking for coherence

Focuses on the alignment and logical connection of ideas or data.

verifying alignment

Highlights the act of confirming that different elements are in agreement.

assessing coherence

Emphasizes the evaluation of how well something holds together logically.

investigating for alignment

Suggests a deeper exploration to find agreements and connections.

examining for congruity

Focuses on identifying matching or corresponding aspects.

scrutinizing for harmony

Highlights a detailed inspection to ensure elements work well together.

exploring for consistency

Focuses on a more exploratory approach for finding consistency.

testing for reliability

Focuses on testing if the data is trustable.

looking for validation

Focuses on the search for validation of the probed subject.

seeking verification

Highlights the active search for ways to verify the validity of the subject.

FAQs

How can I use "probing for consistency" in a research context?

In research, "probing for consistency" involves rigorously examining data, methodologies, and findings to ensure they align logically and empirically. This may involve cross-referencing sources, replicating experiments, and scrutinizing statistical analyses to identify and resolve any discrepancies or contradictions.

What is the difference between "checking for coherence" and "probing for consistency"?

"Checking for coherence" focuses on the logical flow and interconnectedness of ideas or data, whereas "probing for consistency" specifically targets verifying the uniformity and absence of contradictions across different elements or instances.

What are some synonyms for "probing for consistency" in a professional setting?

In professional contexts, you can use alternatives like "verifying alignment", "assessing coherence", or "examining for congruity" to maintain a formal tone while conveying the same meaning.

When is it most important to focus on "probing for consistency"?

It is most important to focus on "probing for consistency" during critical decision-making processes, data analysis, and when integrating information from diverse sources. Ensuring consistency helps to mitigate risks associated with errors, biases, and misinformation.