BP, which is comparable to present rates measured on denudated marls in the Southern French Alps, under a probably climate-driven erosion regime, and (2) 17 to 20 t/ha/yr since 14,500 cal.
In Australia, which is suffering a devastating — and probably climate-change related — drought, you still hear a lot of politicians mouthing nonsense about global warming not being proved, blah blah blah.
The main obstacle to this objective is that these projections are probabilistic in nature; potentially thousands of equally-probably climate-years can be constructed that describe just a single scenario.
The reason for this extinction was probably this climate change.
In 2010, I was appointed Australia's first, and probably only, climate commissioner.
Groundwater depletion, suburban sprawl, periodic droughts (attributable, probably, to climate change): every year, people were asking more of less water.
It was probably about climate change, and quite right too, global warming being an unparalleled threat to our very existence.
So areas that were flooded by storm surge probably have climate change to thank for about a foot and half of extra water.
Newman's central claim is that the activity of the sun and cosmic rays are probably driving climate change and that the world should probably prepare for global cooling.
You probably agree climate change is happening, have maybe even bothered to cut down on how much meat you eat or bunged Greenpeace a quid or two when Russia locked up those Arctic activists.
