Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
At the local scale, uncertainties are assumed to be due to heterogeneities, and a capture zone is expressed in terms of a capture probability plume.
In addition, two delineation methods are compared: reverse particle tracking and reverse transport, where the latter considers local-scale parameter uncertainty by using a macrodispersion term to produce a capture probability plume.
Similar(58)
While different recharge scenarios calibrate equally well to the same data, they result in different capture probability plumes.
The two scales are integrated by using the precautionary principle to merge the individual capture probability plumes corresponding to the different scenarios.
In this paper, we derive semi-analytical expressions for the probability distribution of plume lengths at different levels of complexity.
This was completed by some theoretical results on the effect of problem size and plume detection probability on the effort.
In contrast to the estimated ground deposit hazard, fixed plume height exceedance probability curves for ash concentrations at ground level show hazard (probabilities associated with the amount of suspended fine particulate matter) at the nine study sites to be higher for smaller events, i.e. lower plume heights, than for larger events (Fig. 13).
Fixed plume height exceedance probability maps and curves of ash loading and airborne ash were found to represent the more useful tool as they give an indication of hazard, and therefore required management actions, associated with individual scenarios.
The processes which influence plume geometry, and probabilities of plume detection for a performance monitoring network located between the contaminant source and a downstream compliance boundary, are evaluated.
Probability of failure to contain the plume decreases as the well pumping rate increases.
Furthermore, the probability of failure to contain a plume from escaping site boundaries is analyzed, along with the corresponding sensitivity information.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com