Sentence examples for probability of publishing from inspiring English sources

The presence of methodological/editorial papers was associated with a 3.7% higher probability of publishing qualitative research than its absence (b = 3.68, 95% CI: 0.82, 6.5%), while controlling for covariates.

Thus, UK journals, on average had a 2% higher probability of publishing qualitative research during the 10 year period in comparison to other countries (b = 1.77, 95% CI: −0.18, 3.7%), while controlling for covariates.

A value of four was chosen because multiple studies on publication bias estimated the ratio of the probability of publishing studies showing statistically significant positive results to the probability of publishing other results as close to four.

Our aim was to develop and implement a policy that reduces the probability of publishing false positive research findings.

When a large group of researchers works on a scientific field using the same database, result validation is a powerful way to reduce the probability of publishing false positive findings.

Results from the present study indicate that the journals' policies regarding publication of qualitative research, as reflected by specific reference or guidelines pertaining to qualitative research or appearance of methodological papers and editorials on the subject; independently predict a higher probability of publishing original qualitative research.

Abstracts reporting positive results had a significantly higher probability of being published in full, while abstracts reporting null or negative results were half as likely to be published compared with positive ones (Table 3).

Moreover, we shed light on how the identified features of a case study impact its probability of being published.

One possible criticism of the simulation study is that we used the exact survival probabilities, rather than being forced to read the probabilities off published Kaplan-Meier curves.

Synthesising progression probabilities from a range of published sources may be problematic for a number of reasons.

The model incorporated actual hospital costs (e.g., $8,023 for cesarean and $5,581 for vaginal delivery), utilities to quantify health-related quality of life, and probabilities based on analysis of published literature of successful ECV trial, spontaneous reversion, mode of delivery, and need for unanticipated emergency cesarean delivery.