Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Therefore, each LSC is considered as an individual, which has a fitness given by its probability of preference by the student, as shown in Table 2.
For instance, according to Grilo and Irigoyen (2005), for the evaluated 15 EU member countries and the USA, the probability of preference for self-employment is notably higher for men compared to women.
In this context, in our approach, student's LS are stored as values in the interval ([0,100]) instead of ([-11,+11]) representing a student's probability of preference for a specific LS in a FS dimension.
In order to predict which factors increased the probability of preference for electronic questionnaires, we performed multivariate mixed model logistic regression analyses.
Similar(56)
For each specialty, the figure plots the median predicted probability of specialty preference against the median specialty ranking in the 2012 MIR cycle.
Let Θ = (θ1,…, θ l ), where θ i represents the probability of nucleotide preference at the ith position of the motif, and let θ0 be the probability of nucleotide observing at the nonmotif positions in the sequences.
One study has previously investigated the role of personality domains on rural career intentions and showed that the probability of rural preference was greater with higher scores of openness to experience, agreeableness and self-confidence but lower with higher scores on extraversion, autonomy and intraception.
Nor do they allow us to define comparative probability in terms of preference.
= Coefficient (standard error) - the coefficient represented absolute probability of having rural preference in each attribute compared to base attribute (comparator).
Although the sample size is rather small, neither age, sex or group membership influenced the probability of exhibiting a preference.
The annual probability of mortality and preference weights were assumed to follow a beta distribution because they are restricted to take on values between 0 and 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com