Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
We tested these two hypotheses using paired t tests to compare the probability of illusion between the ±2 Hz conditions at each interbeep interval.
The results (see Figure 3) showed that the probability of illusion between ±2 Hz only differed at interbeep intervals around the inflection points (i.e., 100 ms).
Alternatively, if the effect is determined by tACS windowing action, we would specifically predict a significant change in the probability of illusion only around the inflection points but not at the extreme interbeep intervals.
Crucially, the probability of illusion at all the other interbeep intervals did not change between ±2 Hz conditions (all t values <2.4, all p values >0.23, one-tailed, Bonferroni corrected).
Similar(56)
Here, back to experiment 1, we differently analyzed our data and further tested this hypothesis by assessing the relationship between the proneness to the illusion (calculated as the overall probability of perceiving the illusion across the 15 temporal delays) and how this relates to another index of alpha oscillations, namely, its power.
Another factor that affects the illusion of control, the probability of the action, increased the illusion only in the groups where the situation was highly rewarding (either with frequent desired outcomes, or with infrequent undesired outcomes), although the signs of the illusions were reversed, as we expected (positive judgments in the former case, negative ones in the latter case).
However, Section 4.2 shows how one can explain the illusion of probability of an observer in a world, while the Universe incorporating all the worlds remains deterministic.
We therefore propose that if those two variables are tested separately from each other, it might turn out that it is not personal involvement per se, but probability of action, what produces the illusion.
These celebrations are a fiesta of illusion.
food, inhabits a world of illusion.
ENGLEWOOD The Spencers: Theatre of Illusion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com