Sentence examples for probability for doing from inspiring English sources

The theorem shows that, when the voters are independent and have an equal probability of being right better than random, then majority rule ensures to select the right decision and the probability for doing so approaches 1 as the voters' group size increases (see List 2013 for this and two more formal arguments for majority rule).

However, the 10 percentage point difference in award probability for blacks did not change (–0.107, P < 0.001) after including all covariates.

Vilenkin demonstrated mathematically that the probability for tunneling did not vanish even when he took the initial size of the universe to be zero.

What they found instead was that if the probability for annihilation did not change with time, then the mass of the dark matter particles and the probability of annihilation that would have been required to explain the positron excess were excluded by Planck.

Adherence to this sequence of tests, all at the 0.05 level, ensures that the type 1 error probability for the set of tests does not exceed 0.05.

It thus follows that an increase in the expected risk occurrence probability for one risk does not lead to an increased value for all risks.

For example, for the physically impaired, VR services are associated with a 1.5% increase in the probability of SSDI/SSI receipt for those who received disability insurance prior to the SFY2000 application and a 9.0% decrease in the probability for those who did not receive disability insurance prior to the VR application quarter.

The probability for cost-effectiveness did not exceed 29%% for the imputation-based analysis and 51%% for complete-response based analysis over the range of threshold values.

The probability for cost-effectiveness did not exceed 36% for the imputation-based analysis and 14% for the complete case analysis over the range of threshold values.

For example, over all listeners, the response probability never reaches a probability lower than 0.2 for EP, and for Italian, the probability does not drop below the 0.5 threshold, thus resulting in voiced responses from the Italian listeners only.

The simplification used by Kaplan et al. leads to a probability that does not account for the size of the exposed population and can lead to incorrect results and misinterpretations.