Sentence examples for probabilities of utilization from inspiring English sources

In comparison to Level 1 urbanization areas, the probabilities of utilization by residents in all other levels were significantly higher.

In terms of chronic diseases, after controlling for other variables, only the subgroup with diseases of the genitourinary system had a significantly lower probability of utilization (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.92, p < 0.001), whereas those with most other chronic diseases had either comparable or higher probabilities of utilization.

Instead, our data show that the estimated probability of utilization declined with advancing age group.

Living close to a health service provider is expected to increase the probability of utilization.

Among men aged 65+ years, the underweight men had an increased probability of utilization compared with the normal weight men.

Further, diabetes itself was an important determinant of health care resource utilization, not only in terms of increased probability of utilization, but also in terms of utilization rates.

General practitioner utilization levels were very high 90-911%), and the probability of utilization was equitable by household income and education (education RII = 1.02, 95% CI 0.99-1.05).

Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) derived from logistic regression were used for figures showing the development of probability of utilization by BMI over time.

Figure 2A D shows, with the exception of those aged 65+ years, that at each year obese men had the highest probability of utilization of health care compared with the other BMI categories.

The overall model to predict probability of utilization of PMTCT/HIV-test in participants was statistically significant (−2log likelihood =232.01, χ=109.75, df =11) with a P-value <0.0001, and the overall prediction of the model was 80.5%.

In comparison to those with mild disabilities, the probability of utilization in those with moderate disabilities was 8% lower, and 21% lower in those with severe and very severe disabilities (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.84, p < 0.001).