Sentence examples for pro criterion from inspiring English sources

From the perspectives of both researchers and clinicians, a combined "PRO" criterion for assessing success in multi-modal pain therapy is desirable.

It is unclear why our relative errors in VO2 and VCO2 are higher than other MM3B validation studies, as it is unlikely this was due to errors made in the Douglas bag assessments, as there was good agreement between the primary DBM and secondary Oxycon Pro criterions.

The other did not analyse the PRO data due to poor compliance, and did not address any other recommended CONSORT-PRO criteria, scoring 0/14.

In conclusion, we developed a feasible, combined, PRO-success criterion for multimodal pain therapy.

An mCRPC symptom index meeting all FDA PRO guidance criteria, including content validity, likely has a greater chance of supporting both US label and EMA SmPC claims.

The WOMAC has multiple translations and by consequence, though not ideal, it is currently the only potentially applicable lower limb regional criterion PRO tool that is validated and available in Spanish [ 19, 20, 34] where the psychometric properties were compared to the LEFS [ 37].

This was supported by findings that comparable PROs in the functional index series for the upper limb [ 40] and spine [ 9] were found to be preferable to other advocated English criterion PROs within their development studies and in independent research including translated versions in French and Spanish [ 41].

He wrote back: World Anti Doping Agency Code (applies to the world sports except U.S. pro) has the following criteria for inclusion (the drug or method must meet 2 of the 3): — Enhances athletic performance — Harmful to health and safety — Violates the "spirit of sport" At first, the lawyer in me recoiled at that third category — which does, of course, reflect a certain vagueness.

Seventeen PROs met the criteria (Table 1).

All PROs fulfilled our criteria of an overall response rate of over 80% (Table 3).

All PROs fulfilled our criteria of a proportion of items missing of less than 5% (Table 3).