Sentence examples for priority setting between from inspiring English sources

Here the Government indicates a different rank of cost-effectiveness in priority setting between the individual and group levels.

The participatory pairwise ranking exercise revealed distinct differences in priority setting between HCPs in the two different locales.

The concept of priority setting between users and producers of research is well recognised as a mechanism to produce useful research [ 9- 11] and research capacity development [ 12].

That period has also seen a change in the balance of power and priority setting between the various donor organisations with an explosion in the number of players on the health pitch.

Therefore, a reduction in the variability of the raters' assessments of effect would not improve the degree of agreement when it comes to priority setting between admitted and non-admitted patients.

International policy suggests that collaborative priority setting (CPS) between researchers and end users of research should shape the research agenda, and can increase capacity to address the research-practice translational gap.

We conducted correlation analysis to determine whether there is association in opinions on judging the priority setting criteria between the groups in the districts and in all groups in general.

Such measures may include ensuring efficiency, reducing geographical inequities, equitable priority-setting between health interventions (for diseases that mostly affect the poor versus those that affect the rich, or by sex, age etc).

At the commissioning interface between priority setting and the funding of specific pieces of research, there is some scope for subtle defection from the agreed priorities [ 116].

The problem that remains is: priority setting involves the adjudication between many relevant values and that people (and disciplines) will disagree about which values should dominate in any specific priority setting context and there is no agreed upon normative approach for resolving the disagreement.

One-off priority setting events and time-lag between decision and action prove problematic.