Sentence examples for priority for review from inspiring English sources

The dissolvable products are the second priority for review by the F.D.A. office, after menthol cigarettes, under legislation passed by Congress last year.

Because a similar nonsedating antihistamine was already on the market, the F.D.A. assigned Claritin its lowest priority for review -- it was considered, according to an F.D.A. classification system no longer in use, a drug that "essentially duplicates in medical importance and therapeutic usage one or more already marketed drugs, offering little or no therapeutic gain over existing therapies".

The server will also perform real-time automatic seizure detection, setting EEGs with electrophysiological anomalies to high priority for review by one or more remote neurologists.

While this is not a feature of the proposed system, the server will also perform real-time automatic seizure detection, setting EEGs with seizure abnormalities to high priority for review by one or more remote neurologists.

Here's how the budget process is supposed to go: By the start of February, the president delivers a proposal chock full of policy and economic priorities, for review by the Congressional Budget Office and various relevant committees.

Guidelines for case selection, for the case elements/attributes that are highest priority for peer review, and for acceptable timing of peer-review activities would assist centres to improve consistency of practice, prioritisation and optimisation of their efforts.

As 1 in 10 patients in the B&Z subgroup analysis were prescribed long-term B&Zs and an SSRI, and considering B&Zs negative effects, patients prescribed such combinations should be considered a priority for ongoing review and follow up to minimise inappropriate prescribing, and where possible reduce and stop B&Z use.

FDA has recently accepted a drug named Rucaparib for priority review for the treatment of advanced mutant BRCA ovarian cancer (S1).

The panel will determine the priorities for the review.

Consequently, an approach that assesses the priority for updating individual reviews may be more appropriate in determining when reviews should be updated than a blanket time-bound policy.

The Monograph Programme convenes meetings of special Advisory Groups (composed of external scientists that possess a broad range of relevant professional skills) to review agents nominated for evaluation and to suggest IARC priorities for such reviews (Ward et al. 2010).