Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
prioritized from highest to lowest
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "prioritized from highest to lowest" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the order of importance or urgency of items, tasks, or issues. Example: "The tasks for the project were prioritized from highest to lowest to ensure that the most critical items were addressed first."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
For example, prioritize the string family from highest to lowest in sound.
Wiki
Then demand your customer to prioritize the list of deliverables from highest to lowest so that you can adjust these priorities with the undertakings in your plan.
Wiki
To adjudicate a PET scan report as positive or negative, an algorithm was developed that prioritized the following components of the report from highest to lowest: final radiology impression, description of findings, and standard uptake values (SUVs) (e-Fig 1).
Science
Plots are organized from highest to lowest R2adj value.
Academia
That's a 0.52percentt difference from highest to lowest.
News & Media
There are three levels of intimacy from highest to lowest.
News & Media
Settings range from high to low.
News & Media
And you can go from high to low, but it's very difficult to go from low to high.
News & Media
From highs to lows.
News & Media
Jump back and forth from high to low notes.
News & Media
States are categorized from highest rate to lowest rate.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "prioritized from highest to lowest", ensure that the criteria for determining "highest" and "lowest" are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "prioritized from highest to lowest" without a clear and consistent understanding of what constitutes "high" versus "low". Ensure your criteria remain constant throughout the prioritization process.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "prioritized from highest to lowest" functions as a descriptive phrase, indicating the method or order in which items have been arranged. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Science
33%
Wiki
33%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "prioritized from highest to lowest" is used to describe the arrangement of items based on their importance or urgency. According to Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English. While the frequency of the phrase is rare, its use is clear and consistent across various contexts, including news, science, and general writing. When using this phrase, ensure that your criteria for "highest" and "lowest" are well-defined. Alternatives such as "arranged in descending order" or ""sorted by priority"" may also be considered depending on the specific context.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
sorted by priority
Directly references the concept of priority as the basis for the sorting.
ordered by importance
Focuses specifically on the criterion of importance as the basis for the arrangement.
arranged in descending order
Highlights the direction of the arrangement, moving from the greatest to the least.
ranked in descending fashion
Similar to 'arranged in descending order', but uses different phrasing.
listed in decreasing order
Highlights the direction of the arrangement using a more general term.
ranked from top to bottom
Emphasizes a vertical arrangement or hierarchy more explicitly.
categorized by significance
Focuses on the significance or importance of each item in the categorization.
classified from best to worst
Implies an evaluation or judgment of quality in the arrangement.
graded from highest to lowest
Suggests a formalized system of assessment or grading.
sequenced according to value
Emphasizes the concept of value as the defining factor.
FAQs
How can I use "prioritized from highest to lowest" in a sentence?
You can use "prioritized from highest to lowest" to describe the arrangement of items based on their importance or urgency. For example, "The tasks were "sorted by priority" and then "prioritized from highest to lowest" to ensure the most critical items were addressed first."
What's a good alternative to the phrase "prioritized from highest to lowest"?
Alternatives include phrases like "ranked from top to bottom", "arranged in descending order", or ""sorted by priority"", depending on the specific context.
Is it always necessary to specify the criteria when using "prioritized from highest to lowest"?
While not always explicitly necessary, specifying the criteria clarifies the basis for prioritization. For instance, "The risks were prioritized from highest to lowest based on their potential impact and probability."
What is the difference between "prioritized from highest to lowest" and "prioritized in ascending order"?
"Prioritized from highest to lowest" means arranging items from most important to least important. "Prioritized in ascending order" implies arranging from least to most important (or lowest to highest). They represent opposite arrangements.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested