prioritize more

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "prioritize more" is not correct in standard written English.
It is often used incorrectly because "prioritize" already implies giving something more importance, so "more" is redundant. Example: "We need to prioritize more the tasks that have immediate deadlines."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

"We just have to prioritize more carefully".

The New York Times

"People are realizing they can't accumulate everything they want anymore, and they'll have to prioritize more," he said.

The New York Times

"Last couple of sessions, at least the last one, they've had to prioritize more because the money hasn't been there".

The New York Times

At the first presidential debate, on Sept. 26, Mr. Obama at least acknowledged that the crisis would force him to prioritize more carefully on government spending.

The New York Times

Apple's $349 HomePod is just the latest competitor to prioritize more intelligent music playback; meanwhile there are dozens of speakers with Amazon's Alexa and the Google Assistant.

TechCrunch

When it comes to strengthening quality journalism, Schindler said Google has already been adjusting its algorithms to prioritize "more authoritative sources," and it's also highlighting verified sources in its results with a Top News section.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

Roe Lach and her boss, Mark Emmert, the N.C.A.A. president, have spoken publicly about prioritizing more serious infractions over lesser ones, a sentiment echoed by many of its members.

The New York Times - Sports

Engineers at major technology firms, including Twitter, have explored encrypted messaging products before only to see them never be released because the products can be hard to use – or the companies prioritized more consumer-friendly projects.

The Guardian - Tech

The future development projects in the different EU operative programs and the growing national financed developments can be classified and later prioritized more easily within this framework.

European Transport Research Review

However, based on the results of the mapping on a Kano Model, the appearance factor becomes prioritized more for development of the product design.

Procedia Manufacturing

Following confirmation, counter screens, and dose response analysis, we prioritized more than 100 compounds for further in vitro and in vivo analysis.

Analytical Biochemistry

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When you want to indicate that something needs more attention, use phrases like "give more priority to", "place greater emphasis on", or simply rephrase using "prioritize" followed by specific details. For example, instead of saying "We need to "prioritize more" the marketing campaign", say "We need to prioritize the marketing campaign by allocating additional resources."

Common error

Do not use "more" after "prioritize". The word "prioritize" inherently means to give something greater importance, so adding "more" is redundant. Instead, focus on specifying what you are prioritizing or how you are prioritizing it.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "prioritize more" functions as a verb phrase intended to express the act of giving greater importance to something. However, according to Ludwig, it's grammatically incorrect due to redundancy, as 'prioritize' already encompasses the idea of giving something more importance.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

38%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Social Media

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "prioritize more" is commonly used, Ludwig identifies it as grammatically incorrect due to the redundancy of "more" with "prioritize". Despite its common occurrence across various sources like News & Media and Science, it is advisable to use alternative phrasing such as "give more priority to", "place greater emphasis on", or rephrase the sentence to avoid the redundancy. When aiming for clarity and grammatical correctness, focusing on what you are prioritizing is key.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

give more priority

Replaces the verb with a noun phrase to convey emphasis.

place greater emphasis

Uses a more descriptive verb phrase to highlight importance.

emphasize further

Focuses on adding additional emphasis.

focus more intently

Highlights the intensity of focus.

concentrate more deeply

Emphasizes a deeper level of concentration.

value more highly

Shows a higher degree of appreciation or worth.

regard more importantly

Focuses on the level of importance assigned.

favour more strongly

Indicates a stronger preference.

increase focus

Highlights the action of increase in the focus.

heighten emphasis

Highlights the action of improve in the emphasis.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "prioritize" in a sentence?

Use "prioritize" by clearly stating what needs to be given more importance. For example, "We need to "prioritize customer satisfaction"" is better than saying something needs to be "prioritized more".

What can I say instead of "prioritize more"?

Instead of "prioritize more", try phrases like "give more priority to", "place greater emphasis on", or simply use "prioritize" followed by specific actions.

Is it grammatically correct to say "prioritize more"?

No, it is not grammatically correct. "Prioritize" already implies giving something greater importance, so adding "more" is redundant. You should rephrase to avoid this redundancy.

What's the difference between "prioritize" and "give more priority to"?

"Prioritize" is a verb that means to designate or treat something as more important. "Give more priority to" is a phrase that conveys the same meaning but is less concise. Both are correct, but "prioritize" is often preferred for its directness.