Sentence examples for prioritisation using from inspiring English sources

We proposed an objective protocol for target prioritisation using TargetMine and set up a benchmarking procedure to evaluate its performance.

Our general protocol for target prioritisation using TargetMine is shown in Figure 2. First, we upload a list of initial candidate genes or proteins (e.g., a set of differentially expressed genes or a set of proteins that interact with a given protein) to TargetMine to create a TargetMine gene list.

When the Ontario urgency score was compared with no formal prioritisation using a 90 day maximum waiting time, 48.6% of patients would undergo surgery on average 28.2 days later and 50% of patients on average 27.4 days sooner.

The profile for prioritisation uses is similar if less pronounced.

To drive this effort, we completed a globally representative research prioritisation exercise using an adapted version of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative method.

Finally, an IRPR fuzzy majority based quantifier-guided non-dominance degree based prioritisation method using the associated score reciprocal preference relation is proposed to obtain the final solution of consensus.

It is commonly used in environmental economics [ 17– 19] and transportation [ 20– 22] for prioritisation decisions using public preferences.

Design—We undertook a national consultation and prioritisation exercise using a modified form of the nominal group technique 34 in London, the east of England, Warwickshire, and Scotland and with representatives of English national organisations.

The prioritisation strategy using a risk score with C reactive protein was associated with lower QALYs and higher costs compared with a risk score using estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Of the remaining four prioritisation strategies, using the £20 000-£30 000 per additional QALY threshold range, a risk score using estimated glomerular filtration rate seemed cost effective irrespective of maximum waiting time applied (the incremental cost effectiveness ratios compared with Ontario urgency score were <£410 per QALY).

Using a cost effectiveness threshold of £20 000-£30 000 (€22 000-€33 000; $32 000-$000-$48 000 additional QALY, a peroritisadditionaltegy using a risk score with estimated glomerular filtration rate was the most cost effective strategy (cost per additional QALY was <£410 comprioritisation Ontario urgency strategy