prior we have

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "prior we have" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incomplete expression and may be intended to convey a sense of something that has occurred before a certain point in time. Example: "Prior we have discussed the importance of teamwork in our meetings."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

For tractability, we approximate R b ≃ σ b 2 I B. Using a noninformative prior, we have p ( R b ) = p ( σ b 2 ) ∝ 1 / σ b 2 [38].

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Furthermore, when sample size is moderate and the statistical prior does not correspond to the data generation prior, we have no clear information on how close <img src="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/asset?id=info?doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0014770.e150.PNG" class= inline-graphic"/> is to being uniform.

Plosone

Unlike those prior, we have incorporated not only physiologic measures of baseline lung diffusion and cardiac function into our models, expanded our analysis beyond the initial or highest level of oxygenation, and controlled for the appropriate tendency of clinicians to increase FiO2 in patients with more severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction.

Critical Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Prior, we had been summertime partners -- we went to the beach, food shopping, movies, and then I was off at camp until it was time for me to head off to college.

Huffington Post

Three weeks prior, we had been through the heartache and scare of not knowing whether she would make it and of wondering how long she would have to wait for a new heart.

Huffington Post

As we set up the DJ booth, Frankie and I laughed about the early days: just two years prior we had hoped the music we were playing would catch on in a big way… and here we were, about to open what most consider to be the first disco.

Vice

The fact that the reference priors we have obtained for the EP regression model lead to proper posterior distributions is of substantial theoretical interest.

Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications

The priors we have introduced so far do exactly the opposite: many edges result in many probabilities we have to multiply, and small trees are favored over large trees.

Journal of Cheminformatics

Good fits to the data are possible with a variety of priors we have tried.

Plosone

While many studies have assumed that subjects learn priors, we have measured in detail how human subjects do so.

Plosone

When estimating the accuracy for the functional association priors, we had to discretize the values to differentiate links from non-links.

Bioinformatics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Rephrase the sentence to use grammatically correct structures like "previously we had" or "before this, we have" for clarity.

Common error

Avoid placing "prior" directly before "we have" as it disrupts the standard English sentence structure. Instead, use "previously" or "before" to maintain grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "prior we have" is grammatically questionable and doesn't conform to standard English sentence structure. Instead of functioning as a cohesive phrase, it appears as a disjointed combination of words. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is incorrect.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

66%

News & Media

34%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "prior we have" is considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI's analysis indicates that this phrase is not a recommended construction. Although it appears in a few sources, including news and scientific articles, it's best to use alternative, grammatically correct phrasings such as "previously we had" or "before this, we have" to ensure clarity and accuracy in your writing. When aiming to express a temporal relationship or past possession, these alternatives provide a more precise and professional tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Previously we had

Emphasizes a state or condition existing in the past; uses more formal language.

We previously established

Highlights a past establishment or foundation; more structured and formal.

Before we possessed

Focuses on the state of having something before a specific time; emphasizes possession more directly.

In the past we owned

Highlights ownership in a past time frame; more specific than the original.

Earlier we experienced

Shifts focus to an event or occurrence that happened before; less about possession.

We formerly maintained

Implies a previous state of maintenance or upkeep; more formal and specific.

We once controlled

Highlights past control or authority; narrower focus than the original.

Prior to this we featured

Adds a specific context and focus on a feature that occurred before.

Ahead of this we developed

Specifies a development process that occurred prior to the current state.

Beforehand we secured

Focuses on the act of securing something in advance; less general.

FAQs

What's a grammatically correct way to express "prior we have"?

Instead of "prior we have", use alternatives like "previously we had" or "before this, we have" to ensure grammatical accuracy.

How can I use "previously we had" in a sentence?

You can use "previously we had" to indicate something that occurred or existed before the current situation. For example: "Previously we had discussed this issue in detail."

What's the difference between "prior we have" and "previously we had"?

"Prior we have" is grammatically incorrect. "Previously we had" is a correct and more formal way to express the same idea.

Is it ever correct to use "prior we have"?

No, "prior we have" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's best to use alternative phrasings like "before we had" or "previously we had".