Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The prior assumed one marker from each distribution (i.e. α k =1).
The primary difference between these models is the prior assumed for the effects of the covariates.
More explicitly, our suggested method is adapted to include prior, assumed or intuitive, information on λ in a more direct sense than what is available through using explicit versions, but still avoiding the assumption of a single plausible genetic disease model.
Similar(56)
The NGF prior assumes that the gradient of the desired image is close to the multiplication of the gradient of the original image by a scale factor, which is adaptively proportional to the difference of their gradients.
The uniform prior assumes equal probability density for all allele frequency, whereas the beta distribution assumes higher probability towards a smaller r (more detail can be found in the discussion section and Method S1).
Our beta prior assumes about 50% of the CNVs have a minor allele frequency (MAF) more than 3.5% and about 13% and 1.5% have >10% and >20% MAFs, respectively, which are approximately consistent with Iafrate et al.'s estimate[13].
Uncorrelated lognormal relaxed molecular clocks with a coalescent approach prior assuming constant population size were used.
We used the Yule prior assuming no intra-specific divergences (alternative analyses with a coalescent prior assuming no speciation events lead to almost identical results of GMYC analyses; not shown).
This uniform prior assumes no knowledge of any patient's disease stage a priori, which imposes the least information possible on estimated orderings.
To this end we consider a prior assuming that the treatment is effective in the subpopulation but that there is uncertainty about the treatment effect in the complement.
A "plausible" prior assuming weak genetic control (additive genetic variance, permanent environmental variance and residual variance accounting for 0.2, 0.1 and 0.7) was used with the smallest possible degree of belief parameter (n = 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com