Sentence examples for principles of knowledge from inspiring English sources

This "sense realism" means that individual experience in contact with reality is the origin of knowledge; principles of knowledge follow, rather than precede, the study of specifics.

Still, it is in some sense an innate knowledge of the first principles of knowledge.

But, presumably, the principles constraining the sorts of hypotheses the scientist can posit also include metaphysical principles which can be derived directly from foundational principles of knowledge.

These "proper principles" of knowledge do not involve God.[47] Above and beyond these "created" causes, knowledge also requires an "eternal" cause.

Both texts start with indubitable principles of knowledge, which, in the first instance, lead to conclusions about the metaphysics of God.

This discussion of Du Châtelet's understanding of the (hypothetically) necessary metaphysical constitution of the world further underscores a point about her first principles of knowledge mentioned above.

The use of ontological techniques under the principles of knowledge-engineering allows specification of early knowledge.

Two further points are of particular importance in Du Châtelet's discussion of first principle of knowledge.

Within Paul's system, what plays the role of the Thomistic rationes is the divine essence itself, which is the supreme principle of knowledge of possibles, but not an idea.

Desgabets defends the Cartesian doctrines of sensible qualities, matter, mind-body dualism, mind-body union and interaction in man while criticizing Descartes's argument for the cogito as the first principle of knowledge, the claim that there is such a process as pure intellection, that there are innate ideas, and that ideas have objective reality (pure possibility).

Contemporary views suggest that the distinctions that commonly arise between nouns and verbs are a by-product of their different semantic properties (see Shallice 1988; Pulvermüller et al. 1999), so that "grammatical class per se is not an organizational principle of knowledge in the brain" (Vigliocco et al. 2010, p. 407).