Exact(2)
Barton Whaley and Susan Stratton Aykroyd's "Textbook of Political-Military Counterdeception" (2007) notes that, in the nineteen-seventies, "conjurors had evolved theories and principles of deception and counterdeception that were substantially more advanced than currently used by political or military intelligence analysts".
From these lessons Clarke evolved his principles of deception.
Similar(58)
Two approaches have been suggested to minimize such difficulties: pre-consent (including authorized deception and generic pre-consent) and minimised deception The principle of authorized deception has been advocated by Wendler and Miller [ 15].
While ethicists have long been interested in the conflict between these two principles in cases of deception in medical practice, there is comparatively little empirical evidence concerning whether lay people the potential targets of such deception regard deception as morally acceptable across different medical contexts.
"One of the principles of war is deception.
Their analyses of responses indicated that approximately 70% of students adopted a basically utilitarian attitude to what they had read, and of the 30% who had what might be characterized as a Kantian approach, approximately 10% objected in principle to the use of deception.
We can only justify that inconsistency and the use of deception when we truly serve a greater principle, such as pursuing a highly important and otherwise elusive truth.
As we pointed out in the introduction, debates concerning the moral acceptability of deception in medicine can be understood to represent a conflict between the principle of respect for autonomy and the principle of beneficence.
Since our data show that the majority of our respondents endorse some forms of deception, our data might be understood to suggest that our respondents believed that the principle of beneficence ought to win out in this conflict.
Bug Fest: Masters of Deception.
A pattern of deception!
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com