"principle question" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
For example: "Our principle question is whether it is feasible to complete the project on time."
Regardless of whether this requirement for user involvement is appropriate in principle, questions can be raised about its wisdom in practice, at least with regard to industrial users.
Three principle questions orient themselves according to the tripartite, conditional classification (A, B, and C), proposed in David A. Karnofsky's original article (Table 1).
These systems are tackling first-principles questions, such as can the future be entirely meritocratic, or can people inherently create trust with no data.
Returning again to smoking policy, various restrictions on the behavior of smokers have been justified by appeal to the financial burden on the health care system of caring for smoking-related illnesses.[12] As with all such principles, questions remain about its specification.
The variation in the compromise vs. stick-to-principles questions likely results from the tendency of partisans (especially Republicans in the current environment) to be more eager for compromise by the other side than by leaders of their own party.
While this coherence between the old "regular" and "emergency" programming is thus achieved conceptually, in terms of over-arching goals and principles, questions remain as to how a human rights-based approach to programming and humanitarian principles coalesce in practical operational guidance.
Lastly, Gauthier argues that the principles in question are principles of morality, an argument which makes implicit reference to a functionalist account of moral norms (Gauthier 1986, chapters 7 8).
There are questions of principle and questions of ambition.
Herder shares with Spinoza the basic thesis of monism, and like Spinoza equates the single, all-encompassing principle in question with God (which of course immediately calls into question Jacobi's charge of atheism).
