principle is invalid

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "principle is invalid" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the validity of a specific principle in a theoretical or practical context, often in academic or analytical writing. Example: "After reviewing the evidence, we concluded that the principle is invalid and does not hold true in this scenario."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

If Kateb's argument is sound he has shown that harm is more extensive than we might have thought; he has not demonstrated that the harm principle is invalid.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Due to the comparison principle being invalid, potential well method and concavity argument are used to prove that the solutions blow up in finite time with positive initial energy.

Boundary Value Problems

If the rule is invalid for even just one combination, then the triangle is invalid.

WikiHow

Therefore we can say that the Principle of Exchange of stabilities is invalid [30,31].

Nano Convergence

Michael Slote (1982) attempted to refute the Consequence Argument by showing that the inference principle upon which the argument relies is invalid.

SEP

However, the argument is invalid: the Reciprocity Principle supports obligations even to participants who have not suffered research-related harm.

Bioethics

Thus, the Central Dogma of molecular biology is invalid as an 'absolute' principle: transfer of information from proteins (and specifically from protein sequences) to the genome does exist.

Biology Direct

In some logical systems, the cut principle is a deep theorem; in others it is invalid.

SEP

So, 32 is invalid for this rule.

WikiHow

Palestinian and Israeli officials both point out that any position in negotiations is subject to the principle that "nothing is agreed until everything is agreed" and therefore is invalid without a over-arching deal.

The Guardian

And if the result is invalid, are there closely related paradoxes that threaten the knowability principle without violating the relevant logical standards?

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When arguing that a "principle is invalid", provide specific evidence and reasoning to support your claim. Clearly articulate the conditions under which the principle fails to hold true.

Common error

Avoid stating that a "principle is invalid" without specifying the scope of its invalidity. A principle might be invalid only under certain conditions or within a specific domain, not universally.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "principle is invalid" serves as a declarative statement. It functions to assert that a particular principle, rule, or guideline does not hold true or is not applicable in a given context. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

25%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

10%

Reference

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "principle is invalid" is a grammatically sound expression used to declare that a rule or guideline does not hold true. According to Ludwig, it's most often found in scientific, news, and wiki contexts. While "principle is invalid" is correct, it's crucial to provide supporting evidence and reasoning when making such a claim. Alternatives include "the principle does not apply" or "the principle is flawed". Common errors involve overgeneralizing the scope of invalidity without specifying conditions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the principle is not valid

A direct synonym, replacing "invalid" with "not valid".

the principle does not apply

Focuses on the lack of applicability rather than inherent invalidity.

the principle is incorrect

Suggests the principle contains an error or is factually wrong.

the principle is flawed

Indicates a defect or weakness in the principle.

the principle is refuted

Indicates the principle has been disproven or contradicted.

the principle is untenable

Highlights that the principle cannot be defended or justified.

the principle is baseless

Emphasizes the lack of foundation or evidence for the principle.

the principle is unsustainable

Implies the principle cannot be maintained or supported over time.

the principle is nullified

Implies the principle has been rendered void or ineffective.

the principle is superseded

Suggests the principle has been replaced by a newer or better one.

FAQs

How can I use "principle is invalid" in a sentence?

You can use "principle is invalid" to express that a certain rule or guideline does not hold true or is not applicable in a particular situation. For example: "After careful analysis, we determined that the core operating principle is invalid under these specific circumstances."

What's a formal alternative to "principle is invalid"?

In formal contexts, you might use alternatives like "the principle is not valid" or "the principle is unsustainable". These phrases convey a similar meaning with a more professional tone.

What's the difference between "principle is invalid" and "principle is flawed"?

"Principle is invalid" implies that the principle is incorrect or does not work at all, while "principle is flawed" suggests that there are defects or weaknesses in the principle but that it may still have some limited applicability.

When is it appropriate to say a "principle is invalid"?

It's appropriate to say a "principle is invalid" when you have evidence or logical reasoning to demonstrate that the principle does not hold true or lead to the expected outcomes in a given context. This is often used in academic, scientific, and legal discussions.