Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
Whether something like the exclusion principle is correct would seem to depend upon exactly what relation functional properties bear to their various physical realizations.
It's not hard to see why the fallacy of collectivism has become so popular in big organizations: If the principle is correct, then individuals should not be required to take on risks or responsibilities.
If this principle is correct, we have a problem.
If this principle is correct, then the foregoing absolute sense of 'omnipotence' is incoherent.
If Anselm's principle is correct then either God exists without the possibility of not existing or God's existence is impossible.
If Anselm's principle is correct then if it is possible for God to exist, then God necessarily exists.
Similar(44)
Therefore, the form of Mach's principle is corrected as follows: as "matter tells space-time how to curve", "matter will also tell space-time how to twirl [10].
Thus, according to Adams' conception of morality, adherents of the Control Principle are correct in an important respect, namely, in their understanding that what one is responsible for springs in the right way from oneself.
But it is not clear what Deloitte achieves by continuing to say that its interpretation of accounting principles is correct and the regulator that essentially determines what accounting is legally required, beyond a reputation for aggressiveness.
Needless to say, if such an account of legal principles is correct, the Separation Thesis can no longer be maintained.
Powell argues that his rationale is correct in principle and as an application of McCulloch v. Maryland, the Court's iconic Necessary and Proper Clause decision.4 In Part III, the author discusses the four opinions filed in Comstock, none of which was willing to adopt his "obvious" rationale although seven Justices agreed with the outcome and all four opinions claimed to follow McCulloch.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com