Sentence examples for principal differences in from inspiring English sources
These results have enabled an assessment of the principal differences in urban growth patterns observed at both scales, and the implications for planning these entail.
The TBCs were isothermally oxidized in air at 950 and 1050 °C for 24, 48, 72, 144 and 336 h and the principal differences in TGO composition were analysed.
Obtained results demonstrate principal differences in spatial charge distributions in sheath regions between spherical or cylindrical electrodes of large size and an unbound planar surface submerged in isotropic plasma.
Principal differences in structure within the order include the presence or absence of wings that, when present, consist of two pairs; the presence or absence of a "waist"; modifications of the ovipositor; and adaptations of mouthparts for specific eating habits.
Principal differences in management models real for early and late periods of industrialisation are analysed taking into account that in general nature/environmental management could be effective only in democratic societies, but the set of management methods in these two cases must be principally different.
The principal differences in the sediment reflectivity correlate to how far a seafloor site is separated from the path of turbidity currents that have traveled through the drainage network of Monterey Canyon.
The principal difference in the mechanical stresses and the resulting relaxation in samples S1 and S2 is also illustrated by a detailed AFM analysis of the typical morphological defects that occurred in the GaN cap layers.
The spatial distribution of public transport stops in Brno and Bratislava does not indicate any principal difference in the average walking time from the residence of inhabitants to the nearest stop.
A principal difference in the present study is that the exposures were chronic and low level.
This means there is no principal difference in the quality and availability of services between TAU and Experimental Intervention.
Our sample size in any year was small, exposures were dropping rapidly and the principal difference in biomarker levels seen in the present study was between subjects enrolled in 2001 2002 and 2003 2004.
