Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Clinicopathological characteristics, such as debulking status after primary surgery, are clinically considered important indicators of prognosis [4], [5].
It was recently shown in a prospective study that levels of TIMP-1 in plasma and serum obtained preoperatively from patients with primary breast cancer are associated with prognosis [ 31] whereas plasma levels at the time of primary surgery are not correlated with tissue concentrations [ 32].
In ovarian cancer, well-known clinicopathological prognostic factors in early-stage disease include differentiation grade and tumour rupture during surgery, whereas in late-stage disease histiotype, patient age, performance status and residual tumour after primary surgery are important prognostic factors (Vergote et al, 2001; Winter et al, 2007).
Similar(57)
The suspicion of staple-line recurrence after FEEA of the primary surgery was confirmed, and we performed open partial colectomy for radical resection.
The general condition of the patients before the primary surgery was ASA 1 in two patients (8.7 %), ASA 2 in six (26.1 %), ASA 3 in eight (34.8 %) and ASA 4 in seven (30.4 %).
In the multivariate logistic regression model, previous spinal surgeries, complex plastic closures, increasing number of comorbidities, presence of a hospital acquired infection at the time of a previous surgery, and increasing duration of hospital stay during primary surgery were significantly associated with increased likelihood of developing postoperative SSIs.
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumors from primary surgery were obtained retrospectively.
Minimal residual disease (MRD) after primary surgery is thought to contribute to disease relapse in early breast cancer (BC) [1]; [2].
Primary surgery was performed in all patients.
The current success rate of primary surgery is 80 95%.
The date of primary surgery is defined as entry date.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com