Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Primary samples were obtained during surgery from NB patients undergoing tumor resection at University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine from 1986 to 2003, with written consent by the parents of each patient in the formal style and after approval by the local ethics committee.
Similar(59)
Primary MM samples were obtained from bone marrow aspirates of newly diagnosed patients.
Frozen or FFPE primary tumour samples were obtained from Department of Pathology, University of Utah with Institutional Review Board approval.
Primary tumour samples were obtained from 70 glioma patients at surgical resection of their lesion.
All eligible participants had received modified radical mastectomy and the primary tumor samples were obtained from surgical specimens.
Primary patient samples were obtained from Children's Hospital Colorado and were conducted in accordance with local and federal human research protection guidelines and Institutional Review Board IRBB) regulations.
Primary tumor samples were obtained from high-risk breast cancer patients defined as at least stage 2 or higher breast cancer and/or < 50 years old.
Primary tumor samples were obtained during diagnostic surgery from patients treated at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta hospitals following parental informed consent and Emory University IRB approval.
Primary WT samples were obtained from 18 WT patients (Supporting Information Table S1) within 1 h of surgery from both Sheba Medical Center and Hadassah-Ein Kerem Hospital.
Primary tumour samples were obtained from brain tumour patients with informed consent and were intraoperatively frozen in liquid nitrogen (for RNA isolation) or fixed in 4% formaldehyde (for histology).
Primary tumor samples were obtained from 129 patients (106 males and 23 females) who were diagnosed with HCC and had undergone routine hepatic resection in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University between January 2006 and December 2009.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com