Sentence examples for primary right of from inspiring English sources

Justice Kennedy, however, seemed primarily interested in questioning the law for the wrong reasons, concerned that the Defense of Marriage Act interferes in the primary right of states to regulate marriage and its benefits.

"If someone invaded a country, then that would be their right to do that". For justification he produces a quote from Winston Churchill: "It is the primary right of men to die and kill for the land they live in, and to punish with exceptional severity all members of their own race who have warmed their hands at the invaders' hearth".

This presupposes and requires the right to education – also for girls (excluded in certain places) – which is ensured first and foremost by respecting and reinforcing the primary right of the family to educate its children, as well as the right of churches and social groups to support and assist families in the education of their children.

In the cognitive radio approach, wireless users are categorized into two groups of radio spectrum users ones that have the legitimate primary right of access, called "primary users," and others that do not, called "cognitive users".

The right to vote is a primary right, a right of fundamental importance by which other rights are protected.

We discover below that the most serious objections to the two varieties of Primary Right Theories question the cogency of their accounts of exactly what it is that gives a group within this state a claim to a portion of the territory claimed by the state.

Primary Right Theories are of two types: Ascriptivist (predominantly nationalist) Theories and Plebiscitary (or majoritarian) Theories.

Earlier, we observed that critics of the Ascriptivist version of Primary Right Theory tend to focus on the potential costs in terms of exacerbated ethno-national conflict of incorporating the view into international law.

Critics of the Ascriptivist variant of Primary Right Theory argue that it would legitimize virtually unlimited unilateral, forcible border changes because it confers an entitlement to its own state on every nation (or people" or distinct society).

Thus the moral costs of incorporating the Ascriptivist version of Primary Right Theory into international law may appear prohibitive especially if there are less risky ways to accommodate the legitimate interests of nations, such as better compliance with human rights norms and recourse to intrastate autonomy arrangements.

Both types of Primary Right Theory allow the possibility that injustice provides one type of justification for the unilateral (claim-right) to secede.