Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
The primary efficacy analysis was performed in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population, excluding unknown/missing responses.
The primary efficacy analysis was the time to the first symptomatic recurrence of AF in the CHF/CHD group.
The primary efficacy analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat population whereas the primary safety analysis, on the safety population.
RESULTS A total of 388 subjects were included in the primary efficacy analysis.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 433 participants enrolled, 328 were eligible for the primary efficacy analysis.
The primary efficacy analysis was rates of stroke or systemic embolism (per 100 patient-years) by intention to treat.
The primary efficacy analysis was conducted on the observed values.
The primary efficacy analysis was performed for 128 patients (FAS).
No significant differences were found in the primary efficacy analysis.
Eligible patients only were included in the primary efficacy analysis.
The FAS was the primary efficacy analysis population.
More suggestions(13)
primary efficacy analyses
primary efficacy assessments
primary efficacy variable
primary efficacy population
primary efficacy outcome
primary efficacy objective
primary component analysis
primary efficacy measure
primary efficacy parameter
primary efficacy end
primary efficacy endpoint
primary efficacy response
primary cost effectiveness analysis
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com