Sentence examples for primary effect size from inspiring English sources

Stereoradiographs for evaluation of cup migration (primary effect size) and DASH and pain scores were obtained during 2 years of follow-up.

The Cohen d approach was used to calculate the primary effect size, as it allows data from different platforms to be combined without the use of normalization and can be converted from different effect sizes.

Stereo radiographs for evaluation of absolute component migration (primary effect size) and single-direction absolute component migration (secondary effect size) were obtained within the first postoperative week and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.

The findings of 24 experimental pretest and posttest studies (24 primary effect sizes) published in peer-reviewed journals between January 1, 2000, and December 31 , 2013 revealed that exploratory computerized environments produced a moderate effect size (effect size (ES) = 0.60, SE = 0.03) when compared to traditional methods of instruction.

That is why our primary effect sizes were RD and IR, which require no such imputation.

A clustered randomized design provided adequate power to identify moderate effects on primary outcomes (effect size > 0.35).

If multiple process of care measures were reported and none of them were defined as being the primary variable, effect sizes were ranked and the median value was taken.

The range of primary outcome effect sizes measured as Cohen's d (0.10 0.17) is very similar to the range of estimates (0.09 0.16) obtained in a meta-analysis of a variety of computerized interventions for drinking among university students, conducted primarily in laboratory conditions or in settings unlikely to be scaleable to widespread implementation 5– 8.

The sample size was based on a power calculation using maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) as the primary outcome measure (effect size, 1.16; standard deviation [SD], 4.0 L/min).

Assuming that booklet self management with telephone support produced a treatment effect as large as that found in our previous primary care trial (effect size d=0.41), 33 we calculated that we would need 110 patients per group to test a two tailed hypothesis with 80% power and 5% significance level, allowing for 15 patients to drop out of each condition.

All results for primary and secondary outcomes can be found in Table  4.> -wrap-foot> Annotation: primary outcome; secondary outcome; effect size d: 0.2 small, 0.5 medium, and > 0.8 large effect; FAM: Maintaining family integration, cooperation and an optimistic definition of the situation, SUP: Maintaining social support, self-esteem, and psychological stability and III.