previously there is

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "previously there is" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly as it combines a past adverb "previously" with a present tense verb "is," which creates a tense inconsistency. Example: "Previously, there was a discussion about the new policy changes."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

As has been explained previously, there is currently no inequality between total REE supply and total REE demand.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Because this failure mode has not been reported previously there is a need to establish how its existence influences joint design.

Thin-Walled Structures

And, as I have written previously, there is an increasing consensus that spending in a way that slows increasing inequality is actually essential for growth and that widening inequality hurts it.

The Guardian

Previously, there is no systematic way in selecting the suitable value for heat exchanger network (HEN) design target, which is in this case is the minimum temperature difference (ΔTmin).

Energy Procedia

Although the responses of individual proteins produced by the syncytiotrophoblast to oxygen deprivation have been investigated previously, there is no information available on global protein synthesis in syncytiotrophoblast under conditions of hypoxia.

Placenta

With regard to the preschool example, as discussed previously, there is a selection effect into preschool.

Large-scale Assessments in Education

As mentioned previously there is no official WTP threshold per QALY gained in Germany.

Health Economics Review

As addressed previously, there is consistency between our results and those of previous studies.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

As mentioned previously, there is a great deal of complexity about the regolith of space bodies.

Robotics and Biomimetics

As discussed previously, there is an extent of correlation between some of our variables, which could lead to biased estimates.

Health Economics Review

Although there are now more data regarding HRQoL than previously, there is still a paucity of evidence in CRC patients.

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to past states or conditions, use "previously there was" or "earlier there was" to ensure grammatical correctness.

Common error

Do not combine the adverb "previously", which indicates a past time, with the present tense verb "is". Instead, use "was" to maintain consistency in your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "previously there is" functions as an introductory element followed by an existential clause. However, Ludwig AI notes that it's often used incorrectly due to tense inconsistency, mixing a past adverb with a present tense verb.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

72%

News & Media

21%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "previously there is" appears frequently across various sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The core issue lies in the tense inconsistency, where the past adverb "previously" is combined with the present tense verb "is". To ensure accuracy, it's essential to use "previously there was" or similar alternatives that maintain correct tense usage. The phrase is most commonly found in scientific and news contexts, but its grammatical incorrectness reduces its reliability in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

earlier there was

Replaces "is" with "was" to match the past tense indicated by "earlier", fixing the tense inconsistency.

before there was

Similar to 'earlier there was', it ensures correct tense usage with 'was' and clarifies that something existed at an earlier point.

previously there was

Corrects the tense by using "was" instead of "is" to align with the adverb "previously."

in the past there was

Rephrases to emphasize that something occurred in the past, fixing the original grammatical issue.

formerly there was

Uses 'formerly' to indicate a past state, requiring the past tense 'was'.

at one time there was

Highlights a past state, ensuring grammatical accuracy by using 'was'.

in earlier times there was

Emphasizes the past context, using 'was' to maintain proper tense.

in prior times there was

Synonymous with 'in earlier times there was', but uses 'prior' instead of 'earlier'.

before this there was

Focuses on the temporal sequence, using 'was' to align with 'before'.

prior to this there was

Highlights a sequence of events, using 'was' to maintain proper tense.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "previously" in a sentence with "there is"?

The phrase "previously there is" is grammatically incorrect. The correct usage is "previously there was", which uses the past tense verb "was" to match the past adverb "previously".

What can I say instead of "previously there is"?

You can use alternatives like "earlier there was", "before there was", or "in the past there was" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "previously there is" or "previously there was"?

"Previously there was" is the correct phrase because it uses the past tense verb "was", which aligns with the past adverb "previously".

What's the difference between "previously there is" and "earlier there was"?

"Previously there is" is grammatically incorrect due to the tense inconsistency. "Earlier there was" is grammatically correct because it uses the past tense "was", matching the implied past time.