Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Results: One hundred fifty-one women with prevalent grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and 5 women with prevalent invasive cancer were identified at the first colposcopy.
The Gleason system for grading prostate cancer assigns a score on the basis of the most prevalent and second most prevalent grade.
Conclusion: The high rate of underlying prevalent grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer found in our study (31.2%) indicates that conservative management of women with persistent grade I or II cervical intraepithelial neoplasia should be discouraged.
Randomized studies showed that significantly prevalent grade 3/4 toxicities [ 22, 23] were weight loss, hand-foot skin reaction (5 11%), diarrhoea (6 8%) [ 22], hypophosphatemia (11%), thrombocytopenia (4%), and fatigue (3.4%).
†p < 0.05 aFractures present at baseline (prevalent fractures) BMI, body mass index; FEV1, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second; FVC, Forced Vital Capacity At baseline, eight out of 49 patients (16.3%) had at least one prevalent Grade 1 fracture (Table 2).
Similar(55)
A Gleason score 7 represents either a 3+4 score, where pattern 3 is the primary and prevalent Gleason grade or a 4+3 score, where pattern 4 is the primary and predominant Gleason grade.
If prevalent high grade disease was missed in women on biopsy and recall, we would expect more high grade lesions to be detected during follow-up and at exit examination in this arm, which is what we saw.
Initial colposcopic detection of obviously prevalent CIN grade 2 or 3 reduces risk.
Her-2 and TN tumors were the most prevalent in grade III and Ki-67 over 20%%.
This strategy, however, also has drawbacks, 13 chiefly with regard to the reliability of punch biopsies in identifying prevalent high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Glioblastoma multiforme is a grade IV astrocytoma, and the most prevalent form of astrocytic tumors in adult patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com