Sentence examples for prevalence target from inspiring English sources

Of the personality factors, only extraversion marginally predicted low prevalence target reaction time, t = –1.94, p = 0.055, β = –0.15, such that introverts have greater reaction time, and thus is the only personality factor included in our final regression model.

This finding that the predictors associated with better low prevalence target detection were also associated with fewer false alarms suggests that these factors predict an increase in sensitivity, rather than only a shift in the decision criterion for responding "target present".

This is shown to be the case even if the long-term disease control mf prevalence target is set to be lower (eg, 2.35%) than the infection threshold (3.55%) at which disease develops in communities.

This effect of the achieved post-control mf prevalence following MDA on the rate of return of infection prevalence to pre-control equilibrium values is more clearly shown in Figure 2B, and indicates how this relationship can be used to guide the setting of the mf prevalence target for long-term disease control.

†Mortality from smoking can cause point prevalence to fall; hence prevalence target can be achieved earlier in the smoking model.

Recommendations include establishing an AVF national prevalence target rate, discontinuing the administration of intravenous prophylactic antimicrobials prior to CVC insertion and promoting the use of CVC insertion checklists.

High prevalence performance was a significant predictor of low prevalence target-absent reaction time, t = 7.16, p < 0.001, β = 0.51.

In addition, we found that each of the factors that predicted better target detection, with the exception of vigilance, also predicted slower low prevalence target-absent reaction times.

The multiple regression model significantly predicted the low prevalence target-absent reaction time, F 4, 136) = 19.97, p < 0.001, adjusted R 2 = 0.351.

Table 3 Low prevalence reaction time regression results   t p value β High prevalence performance 7.68 <0.001 0.53 K 1.89 0.06 0.13 Attentional control 2.01 0.04 0.14 Extraversion –2.02 0.04 –0.14 t, p, and β values for each predictor in the final regression model for low prevalence target-absent reaction time.

The hierarchical reaction time regression model predicted the low prevalence target-absent reaction time, F 4, 136) = 20.7, p < 0.001, adjusted R 2 = 0.36, over and above the cognitive model alone, adjusted R 2 change = 0.014, F change = 4.09, significant F change = 0.045.